🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book aims to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who studied his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events stated the key criterion was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. His harder version prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.