🔗 Share this article

During last year's race for the White House, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to lower costs starting on day one. However, once his inauguration, there was minimal attention to affordability issues. This shifted following inflation-weary voters expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration initiated a hastily assembled campaign to address living costs. Regrettably, the drive is a hot mess—characterized by illogical claims, inconsistencies, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Claims and Grocery Store Reality

Just two days after the election, Trump kicked off his cost-reduction push with a disastrous remark: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed a lack of empathy for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting the grocery store. Essentially, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were pushing up costs? Official statistics show banana prices rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, the price of beef went up 14.7%, and coffee prices surged 18.9%—partly because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, prices rose in the majority of food categories monitored by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Statements

Despite these numbers, the president persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. Since election day, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements contradict the fact that general costs have clearly increased after the previous administration. At present, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, that’s half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump boasted that gas prices had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data indicate they average $3.19.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many voters are angry about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. As a result, aides proposed a simple solution: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Possible Effects

As some tariffs reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, the administration will likely claim that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a fire that he had started. In another instance, while speaking McDonald’s executives, he stated that “this is the golden age of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans facing hardships—especially when millions face losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey from October, three-quarters of respondents think economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter rate them positive. Another poll showed that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Suggested Measures

The treasury secretary, the president’s chief financial officer, recently disputed claims of a prosperous era. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost around tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about living costs, the president proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that Congress—concerned about huge budget deficits—will approve the proposal. This idea would likely increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy.

A further proposed solution for cost issues involved introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, the truth is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—often cutting them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Prospects

As part of their affordability campaign, the administration have again blamed Biden for financial challenges, including increasing costs. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” This is unfounded and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden left a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, Trump’s policies—particularly his tariffs—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi fears that if large states such as major economies tumble into recession, the US could face a widespread recession. During recessions, people typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative probably ineffective to hold down prices, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—something that struggling Americans cannot handle.